Skip to content
type1.science

CASCADE (Cascade Kids newborn screening)

Pacific Northwest Research Institute (Hagopian lab) with the Washington State Newborn Screening Program

What it is

A Washington-state program that screens for Type 1 diabetes and celiac risk using leftover newborn-screening blood spots, with no extra blood draw and no appointment for the first step. Higher-risk children are invited into monitoring.

Editorial review: .

Most recent recorded citation date: 2022-03-21. Only explicit date metadata is included; an undated citation may be newer. This does not mean every claim was reviewed on that date.

Trial status, labels and access can change between reviews. How we review the evidence · How to read the evidence

Full sources ↓Full discussion ↓Report an issue →

Available nowModerate evidencescreeninggenetic-risk-scoreautoantibodynewborn-screeningdried-blood-spotpopulation-basedusceliacearly-detectionOfficial site ↗

Evidence behind this assessment

Key evidence notes. Study results, product eligibility and access answer different questions.

Who was studied?
Study populations and analysis groups vary. Product age limits alone do not describe who was studied.
Benefit or performance
Predictive value: Screens residual newborn blood spots, then confirms with islet-autoantibody testing; follow-up is periodic monitoring with disease-specific autoantibody tests.[3]
Important harms and treatment burden
Read the safety discussion and original sources. A missing summary does not establish safety.
Approval and country access
Country-specific approval and access are not summarized in this record.Approval, trial recruitment, local supply and funding are separate. Check the cited label or access source.
Follow-up and remaining uncertainty
Read the full discussion and original sources for follow-up duration and study limitations.
Editorial score: calculation and evidence

A weighted editorial judgment on a 0–100 scale, not a probability of success or a measured treatment effect. Higher criterion scores mean more favorable assessments.

Default calculation: 78 × 25 + 72 × 25 + 72 × 20 + 92 × 15 + 58 × 15 = 7440; divide by total weight 100. Unrounded weighted result: 74.4.

Predictive value78

Screens residual newborn blood spots, then confirms with islet-autoantibody testing; follow-up is periodic monitoring with disease-specific autoantibody tests.[3]

Actionability72

Higher-risk children enter a follow-up monitoring study with periodic autoantibody testing, the pathway that lets families catch progression before symptoms appear.[1]

Reach72

Designed as true population screening from residual newborn cards (target 75,000 samples over five years) across Washington state, reaching infants regardless of family history; geographically confined to one US state.[1]

Low burden92

The initial screen reuses the leftover state newborn-screening blood spot, so there is no new blood draw and no appointment; only higher-risk children give fresh samples for monitoring.[1]

Access & cost58

Open to consenting Washington families during the study, but it is a time-limited feasibility project tied to one state's newborn-screening system, not a permanent service.[2]

The full picture

CASCADE (Combined Antibody Screening for Celiac and Diabetes Evaluation) is a Washington-state program, led by the Pacific Northwest Research Institute in partnership with the state Newborn Screening Program, that tests for Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and celiac risk using blood that has already been collected. After a family consents, the program reuses the leftover dried blood spot from routine state newborn screening, so the first step needs no new blood draw and no appointment.

Screening includes follow-up with islet-autoantibody testing and ongoing monitoring: children flagged as higher-risk are invited into a follow-up study, and PNRI performs surveillance by monitoring infants periodically using disease-specific autoantibody tests.

The goal is reach: by riding existing newborn-screening infrastructure, CASCADE aims to screen on the order of 75,000 samples over five years across the general population, not just families with a history. Children found to be at risk receive monitoring, the route to catching progression before symptoms appear. It is a feasibility effort confined to one state rather than a standing national service.

What's next for this

  • →Feasibility readout from up to 75,000 residual newborn blood-spot screens, informing whether genetic-plus-autoantibody screening can ride existing newborn-screening infrastructure at scale

Sources

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]